Author: DigillexDate: April 14, 2025

rem vs em vs px in CSS: What’s the Difference and When to Use Each?

Table Of Contents

If you’re wondering which unit to use for sizing elements in CSS—rem, em, or px—here’s the answer upfront:

  • Use rem for consistent, root-based sizing and accessible typography.
  • Use em when you need sizing to depend on a parent container.
  • Use px only for fixed-size elements where scaling isn’t necessary.

Each unit has its use case, and choosing the wrong one can break layout consistency or hurt accessibility. Let’s break it all down in detail.

What Are rem, em, and px in CSS?

These three units define how you size elements on a webpage. They’re not interchangeable, even though they all control dimensions like font size, spacing, or layout width.

What is px?

px stands for pixel. It’s an absolute unit.

When you define something as 16px, it’s exactly 16 pixels on the screen, no matter the context. That sounds simple, but it has a drawback—it doesn’t scale. If a user changes their browser’s font settings for better readability, px ignores that.

Use Case: Great for borders, icons, or precise layout elements that don’t need to adjust based on user settings.

Drawback: It’s rigid and not ideal for responsive design or accessibility.

What is em?

em is a relative unit. It scales based on the font size of its parent element.

For example, if a parent container has a font size of 16px and you define a child element with 1.5em, it will scale to 24px. However, em is cumulative—nested elements inherit this scaling, which can lead to unexpected results if you’re not careful.

Use Case: Excellent for modular components like buttons or cards that sit inside other styled elements.

Drawback: Can cause compounding issues if nested too deeply.

What is rem?

rem stands for “root em.” It scales based on the font size of the root element (<html>), not the parent.

If the root font size is set to 16px, then 1rem always equals 16px—no matter where it’s used. This gives predictable, consistent results across your site.

Use Case: Perfect for consistent typography and layout spacing.

Drawback: Less flexible than em in some isolated design modules.

rem vs em vs px | Key Differences

Here’s a quick breakdown of how these units compare:

Featurepxemrem
TypeAbsoluteRelative to parentRelative to root
ScalabilityLowMedium (cumulative)High and consistent
AccessibilityPoorBetterBest
Use CaseFixed items (icons, borders)Component sizingTypography, spacing

When to Use rem, em, and px

Each unit shines in different scenarios. Understanding their behavior helps you pick the right one for your CSS strategy.

Use px When…

You need precision. For example:

  • Borders: 1px solid #ccc
  • Icons: 32px width/height
  • Images: when fixed aspect ratio is needed

These values shouldn’t change even if the user adjusts browser settings.

However, avoid using px for font sizes. It breaks accessibility and doesn’t respect user preferences.

Use em When…

You want styles that scale with a parent container. For example:

  • Buttons inside a card with unique sizing
  • Nested lists where sub-items should inherit a base size but grow slightly
  • Media queries where scaling is based on layout context

Be cautious, though. If you use em in too many layers, sizes can stack unexpectedly and become hard to debug.

Use rem When…

You want consistency across your design system. Ideal for:

  • Typography (headings, paragraphs, captions)
  • Padding and margin spacing
  • Layout components (grid gaps, column widths)

You can define a global scale by setting the root font size to something like 10px or 62.5% (16px * 0.625 = 10px), so 1rem = 10px, making calculations easier.

when to use rem vs em vs px
Key differences in rem vs em vs px

Best Practices and Tips

  • Set the root font size once and forget:

html {
font-size: 62.5%; /* 1rem = 10px */
}

  • Use rem for layouts and text to ensure consistent spacing.
  • Use em for components that need to scale with their container.
  • Reserve px for small, precise elements only.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Overusing px for everything. It may look fine on your screen but can ruin accessibility.
  2. Nesting too many em-based styles. This causes compounding and results in unpredictable sizes.
  3. Mixing units without structure. If your spacing is in px, font in em, and width in rem, debugging becomes harder.

Stick to a pattern that suits your design system. For most, that’s rem for base sizing and em for component flexibility.

Final Thoughts – Which One Should You Use?

To wrap it up:

  • Use rem for fonts and layouts—clean, predictable, and scalable.
  • Use em for flexible component design—context-aware and modular.
  • Use px for pixel-accurate elements—non-scaling but useful in fixed contexts.

Rule of thumb:

Fonts? → rem
Buttons? → em
Borders? → px

Stick to that and your CSS will be cleaner, more scalable, and user-friendly.

FAQs

Is rem better than px?
Yes, for fonts and layouts. It respects user settings and scales better across devices.

Should I use em or rem for font sizes?
Prefer rem for consistent sizing. Use em only when you want font size to adapt within a component.

Can I mix px, rem, and em in the same file?
Yes, but do it strategically. Avoid using all three for the same type of property.

Scroll to top